IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

EQUAL PAY

Black Dwarf Vol. 13, No. 11, 14 February 1969 · pp. 4-5 of the scan · 356 words

The scan: v13n11-feb-14-1969.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-3 of 4; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 4 of the scan

wrong, I always thought revolutions were made by the masses. And the problem is therefore: how do we do it?

Yours fraternally, Martin Bashforth, 11 Kyndhurst Road, Wolverhampton, Staffs.

LOST GLOVES

Dear Sir, I lost a pair of black gloves in the balcony of the Central Hall Methodist Church at Friday's debate. They were not found by the cleaner or in the caretaker's possession on saturday.

If a reader did find them, I live at 35 POETRY Sir, am editing, for Penguin Books, anthology of Socialist poetry. This will be completely international, in English and English translation, and will include poets from the 1830's to the present day. In many cases extant translations of Socialist poems diCi inadequate: crippled by archaisms and inversions and unlikely to appeal to modern reader. Is would, therefore, be delighted to hear from the poets among CARCS who have translated Socialist poems of any language into English. A stamp-addressed envelope would be appreciated.

Yours faithfull. Dear Sir, The issue of equal pay is more complicated than you seem to suggest "Equal pay would cost British Capitalism up to £600 million a year". What makes you think so? Over the past 20 odd years, the share of wages in National Income has going to profit remains constant, and we assume the share going capital does too (it is hard to see how its being reduced could benefit the worker), then the only people to suffer would be the male workers, who would effectively by paying the women via increased prices and reduced real wages. Perhaps it is men and not big business who are exploiting the women and are "so determined to prevent women from getting equal pay"

To avoid this conclusion you must demonstrate how the share of profit can be reduced an issue which you did not touch on at all.

Is this analysis accurate?, or is it a load of unsound bourgeois economics? (Perhaps that is sound in the context of an unsound bourgeois economy).

Yours, Jonathan Chiswell Jones, 12Yarrell Mansions.

Queen's Club Gardens, London W.14.

SMASH

page 5 of the scan

The Black Dwarf 14th February 1969 P.5

← FAMILY PLANNINGON BEING AN APPRENTICE →

Something wrong on this page?