IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

SACK TORY TO WORKERS ORTESY U.C.S.

Red Weekly No. 126, 20 November 1975 · p. 4 of the scan · 155 words

The scan: rw-no126-nov-20-1975.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-1 of 4; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 4 of the scan

Plessey workers followed the UCS work-in with a strike -in. pation. In four weeks not only did their occupation set Merseyside alight, it terrified employers and forced Harold Wilson to intervene personally.

Labour costs

The Fisher Bendix company intended to transfer production of its washing machines to Spain to lower labour costs, and planned to close the factory by May 1972. An animated discussion on the relative merits of a work-in or sit-in took place amongst the shop stewards and militants. A delegation was sent to UCS and Plessey to review the effectiveness of the alternatives. Jack Spriggs, AUEW convenor, reported:

*We decided that the UCS-type operation of a work-in was impractical for us. Plessey was more effective. The work-in involves problems of supply to keep production going, sales of products and payments of workers. At Plessey a strike-in is tying up the movement of

----- pull-quotes -----

AND © PLESSE PLE

← THE OCCUPATIONDeadline →

Something wrong on this page?