IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

'Saving' the Government?

Red Weekly No. 162, 18 August 1976 · p. 3 of the scan · 455 words

The scan: rw-no162-aug-19-1976.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-5 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 3 of the scan

So the lefts' are led by the nose by the right-wing leaders of the Labour Goverment, who are far more concerned with protecting the interests of the bankers and the bosses rather than 'saving' any Labour Government.

Atkinson's arguments were promptly rebuffed — or more precisely, side-stepped - by fellow Tribunite Eric Heffer. "There is a difference, said Heffer, "between voting to sustain a Labour Government in office and agreeing with or accepting all of their policies? But the point is this: whether or not the lefts are willing to defend wages and jobs by actually voting down Labour's anti-working class policies. Their refusal to do so shows that their 'disagreements with' and 'non-acceptance' of Government policies is just so much balm to soothe their wretched consciences.

What is equally disgraceful is that the Militant, which claims to be Trotskyist and has considerable influence inside the Labour Party Young Soc ialists and several constituency parties, supports the Tribune Group's betrayal: "It would be a serious mistake, as the Tribune Group recognises, to vote in such a way as to bring down the Government. As Arthur Latham said, the Labour Government might be like a bad meal, but another Tory Government would be like a dose of arsenic for the workers.

The same argument could have come from Callaghan and Healey and their collaborators in the TUC.

No compromise Red Weekly rejects all these 'don't fight' policies. We say that the lefts should vote down the Government's attacks in Parliament and fight for alternative anti-capitalist policies and action in the trade unions and Labour Party outside. Such policies would include work-sharing on full pay to combat unemployment, and a sliding scale of wages and social expenditure to defend living standards and the social capitalist crisis. At the Labour Party conference this means that every delegate should take a clear stand against Labour's Tory policies and vote to remove those responsible for their implementation.

There can be no compromise on the cuts and unemployment. If defend.

ing wages and jobs means bringing down the Labour Government, then the responsibility lies on the heads of those who have squandered the fruits of the victory won by the miners over the Tories in 1974. And such a campaign would mean apart from anything else. that no-one could possibly interpret any subsequent Labour election victory as 'an endorsement of 'policies.

vich aim to discredit revolutonary Marxist leaders ano revolutionary As It is, the Healyite circus wound up in town last Sunday night in the appropriate surroundings of the Hammersmith Palais. There the assembled multituce — complete witn transistol radios when the speeches got boring -gathered to see the show. As usual the WRP cadres had been struggling to

← THE LEFTS' "DILEMMA"That's Capitalism →

Something wrong on this page?