IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

LETTERS Why no trade union price index?

Red Weekly No. 172, 1976 · p. 4 of the scan · 442 words

The scan: rw-no172-oct-28-1976.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-6 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 4 of the scan

teachers are demoralised after the sellour or ine collece occupations last term by the National Union of Executive. One of the dangerous results or unis demoralisation was recogniocua a recent general meeting of the Student Union of Colleges of Hull (SUCH). It is Ine crowin or lascion SUCH meeting Platform For Fascists ortance of this is that SUCH includes the Association of Commerce and renology, which sent a fascist delegate to the NUS conference. The motion was passec despite intimidation by tne lascists. mobilisation by local IMG and IS militants and sympathisers showed ine students that there was an alternative to reactionary oolicies Students Dac -conditions they can look for such scapegoats overseas students. in us contex Executive must be passed a No or rational saton or camous workers motion. The impstudent movement to combat students focus for trade union militants students fighting the cuts.

parents in to use their the economy in 'hammer out their statisucue. a debate in their pages and in the pages of the French press in general), on the subject of government price indices. In are calculated by the couvalen or me enouse are, of course, used as the basis for government propaganda about inmation the standard of living, and the state of general. On a more oractical lever me inex is usee ds c weapon in wage negotiations and as a measure for the periodic adjustments of The point of the debate is this: the INSEE index is unjust and it consistently unceresummates me rue use He Cos of living. It is furthermore surrounded by which makes it impossible to find out exactly how it is calculated The two biggest unions in France play a part in unmasking this fraud: both the that they ought to agree to publish jointly one single result What I would like to ask you is this: is tnere any antemative trade union otherwise, to the figures produced by th CSO in Britain? Given the importance (both ideological and practical) placed o these figures by the ruling class's offer sive at the present time, I think it woul be a good idea to explain to workers on what inev are based, ho they are calculated, and just how accur ale mey redity die As a background to tnis question also think that Red Weekly should b devoting more space to combating th eternal capitalist myth about wages being the cause of rises in prices extraordinary success British ruine cass sinas in probadd ing this myth (a success which its Frenc counterparts must envy it!), it seems t me inat tne revolutionary left shoul engage in a little basic economic

← The elitism of Terry EllisABORTION IN DEMAND →

Something wrong on this page?