the report of the 26 February ingham (Red weekly, з магсп), SWP deliberately organised the diverting of can ac or an lascisis away rom the demo in order to heckle comrade concerned may have acted independently. on ner an initiative or uncer oressure of the group's sid not produce any evidence that ne sunt was olanned or ever anctioned by the swe leader hat they are guilty cynical and divisive manoeuvre Is simoistic and one sided. toere postor eye points to are four rive home in connection with • First for someone to split off a tiny section from a united maren divert it futile yelling prison or both) can only be adequately explainee in erms or lunacy or provocation.
that even if this particular stunt was not sanctioned by the SWP leaders, it is Just one o In e I usually enjoy reading March].
SWP instructions' were we Nor the NF meeting since and the NF