IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

TROOPS OUT NOW enough BIG FLAME

Red Weekly No. 200, 1977 · p. 5 of the scan · 751 words

The scan: rw-no200-may-supplement-1977.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 5 of the scan

1sHouLо нка to ciens up any confusion which may have Tesue of 12 May raising, you stated that at a meeting In Sheftieid | 'axplsinWhat I explained in fact, was the ceneral posilion of our contioue t0 mora olnt acilon beiwaen lelt king tou nn Succe0o Dor MoSEL Tay yoars of the and trade uniar officiale in entor cina the Dolicieg o Ihe SOCi Sonare ASs rosE RE AAA ImOl tart debate on the lelt over the way genreation w thin industry and the PUSI S S8C001 TiS Is Caz a resul Dia is totally inadequate to meut the ChirAC D Com nE CEos ANtIONS SEA MIErENEIDS alisation and rationalisation private Forusl, and the tripartile front o SUEL ISO U CULMI LOIRE STES LEL GAN MICkAe aa nary other large firms militant have taken up ingly for combine committas ot SHOD SEAR NS VOISE AVE METI many cases w in heroe opposition Irom not only employere ILuce but als union officiale bincluding those of EWR0 C08 SU0 HUSS R an alermpt lo uncemmme mer groupe.

sulled trom an item in your In your section on fund structive cooperation understanding our two newspepers. STEVE BOND (Sheffield)

Inaddition, Isaid that it was would make contributions to neIr SWn IHE axample of the kind of con.

and there be Howavar, this does not negate the DO CICOE otolenCO waIGe petion, oyalist lockoul and was in abs lute agreement with your genere Soliderly with ihe RA publican Resistance, Troops Out Now! - I feal that when it come:

out exactly and militants l Bosin oucht te ba doing. You coverage is considerably lacking Mason's immediate response to the lockout was the introduction EATO BFIL INC MISHOR OR TR HIMB CUN The troops appear to be stationed In anti-unionist areas, and Mason Concaal the taet hat ley were tr made attempt uso soangt erronisls10,he nationalist population.

done, where It is to be raided; in oter words what tasks face the British labour movement in thia present crisis, And the answer is sent Anok a arma ano suapnos aomo 10 m0 HE frogos in reano When it was reporled thai Ulster travelling trom Scotiand to the 6 Countles to help anforon the HO HOR RIERMOES War Include the troops Army! No armsl No subclieg to the occupation forces in reland.

Thie leads on to the question -tho is going to break the "'strike"?

hich for us is the questior "strike' ürlish Government gre flatly oc posed to the demand tor a return o Stormont, and clearly if L: their interasts that the 'strike' is BAAi m moiown Tenna. sinaary nis in me inieresis oranranspe unona et matano Imparalist investmant that there is no retum to Stormant and that tho 'strike" is ended - again in What are these lerma? That under no circumstances should independent mobilisation of ran Bonno cas I Bouc D0 position to the Lovglisis. or ani mass activity in the anti-unionist gheltone againsi the British coauIn this way Mason can be free to NSE MAR HAALA COAS™O TE lockout to launch a major offenpariailam, and to the trade union on the troops or the RUC workers" sait-defence Warati n aide the bosse and L CooREs, Wowe DusHow fonshipe with the Iriah trade because of their simiterfles in programme (Bill of Rights elc.), British trade unions have a acci soone To nva u brienlation in the Britis working class. Revolutionaries ought to have a direct orientatior into the workers" movement, ag ainst the burgauomcy, damanginc Mal Inay soda oul ano1 T lance on the troops and the RUC workers" self-defence that promote and heip in solf-defence They muat apell out these mea detond the right of the Irish trad UNION MO OON SO DAIST &D tu should raise the question of the bureaucracy must be forced to act on their own GOTTIN, NO MONEr nEN OOr mist. They arn in favour of 'an end BECUEE!

CATANIS CIAR N DAIRIA WAAI ,tha nood for an solidarity tawards the British trade union movement S CrUCI Mn0 11-581000001 the 1974 UMC HtSn0 HesS-ceNaoRanm: policies of the leadership thal le al and i1 is that leadership whi weng with nuray n initiatie which we fight was not that he attem pied ii, but that he made no alsempt to mo blise all workero, and in particular Tente in detente of ele unily of own the trade union movemant, inde DEBAR TOLAR OIE British state.

MIKE PINTER (Belfast)

----- pull-quotes -----

nean hy tan bn ay plant union

← BritainNational wage bargaining →

Something wrong on this page?