IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

Lash Labour'

Red Weekly No. 39, 15 February 1974 · p. 8 of the scan · 177 words

The scan: rw-no39-feb-15-1974.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-4 of 5; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 8 of the scan

Arguered wish the Pour Office as a newapper. Publisted by Reigorest for Red Weekly, 182 Pentonvule Rood, Tondon N.I, (01-837 6954) and printed by F.I. Tirbo, 182 Pensonile Road, London N.J. (01-837 9487) Supporters of the Irish struggle in Britain were told by a Labour Councilor last Thursday to'lash the Labour Party during the election.

Councillor Paddy O'Connor, the Dep Luty Chiel Whip of the Labour Party on the Greater London Council, was addres sing a public meeting organised by trish Political Hostages Campaign in Lon don's Conway Hall Speaking with some Labour candidate shoald be asked to state volved in last year's occupation start. This his or her position on the hunger atrikers and on the Irish struggle.

Cyril Casack, the well-known trish factor, said the demand by the prisoners to serve their sentences in the North of Irelund was "oo all levels a reasonable one'; and Irish International and Charlton Athle to socoer-player, Tamonn Dunphy, said support for the political prisoners, and attacked the "political criminals at WestBrian Rose-Smith of the Heldane Soci

← ESSEX STUDENTS BACK MINERS AGAINSMASH THE TORIES ON ALL FRONTS TORIES OUT- SMASH ALL PAY LAWS NUM EXEC STEPS BACKWARDS →

Something wrong on this page?