IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

Interview with Jules Housse of the LCR

Red Weekly No. 42, 8 March 1974 · p. 7 of the scan · 361 words

The scan: rw-no42-mar-8-1974.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-6 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 7 of the scan

bost trudo union militants, often signin:

ruvolutionists in the LAV who mobilised first to take up the call on that occasion revolutionary left, The consumenog of exeluiine tero an indicidual basis Bet the meinbers of the LAV'+ esocutivu committeo ar in canet Ol mdciestH isaticns. mating the rank and file's reaction. Many and independonl-prossntly agree with cerHow were these exclusionary mowes put into effect and what was the responser Ar the national conference of the LAV, the leadership proposed a motion which would have made mem bership of a revolutionary organisation incompatible with membership of the LAV. They even antici pated the exclusion of sympathisers of the Delegates belonging to the Communist Party were, however, in tea minds about this move-afraid that one thing might motion. eL O SoOE Soae TE TE13 one day be upplied to their own party. So tho timal motion anly provided for a watch to be kept on the activity of the revolution aries, with exclusions to be carried out on But the motion still contained the disgracefal statement that the LCR and the KBL (Maoists) are anfi-trade anion orginWe immediately responded hy setting up along with other militants a committo: to delond freedom of expression in the trade unions. Protest petitions have atreaay hoen signed by a large number of peoplecven incang some promincas weeiger: of the Socialist Parry As yet there have been no exclusions hut wu have no illusions on this scort. However, me feel certain that if any militants ate thrown out, we will be able to mobilise many workers who have so fat not te actoo to unis siouanon Decause ol ul vague monding of the national conference What can workers in the rest of Europe do?

The sending of protests from other European countries to the LAV (LAV, 65 Boulevard Kennedy, Fachs/Alzette, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg) and to the delence committoc (BP Militant 1182, Luxembourg City) is very important for us and for Uu morae of the militant, workers, Even protests coming from small trade HAKI DHUE NS BHU SSAnC trade union leaders are terriliod of petting a bed name internationally;

Red Weekly 8 March 1974 Page 7

← Statement by defence committeeINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY RALLY →

Something wrong on this page?