IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

Squatters re-take 220 Camden High St

Red Weekly No. 52, 16 May 1974 · p. 8 of the scan · 178 words

The scan: rw-no52-may-16-1974.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-5 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 8 of the scan

Registered with the Post Office as a newpaper. Published by Repocres for Red Weekly, 182 Pentonpille Road, London N.J. (01-837 6954) Red Weekly, 97 Caledonian Road, N.I. Squatters have reoccupied 220 Camden High Street, the London shop premises used until recently us an organising centre for numerous working class groups in the area. They mored in at 6 p.m. on Tuesday, just three weeks after the High Court order obtained hy property specelator Joe Levy had been carried out with the aid of over 100 policemen.

ther things Levy's stated intentions t Printed by Socialist Worker Prinpers and Publishere Lid. (TU), Corbridge Works, Corbridge Crescent, London E2 9DS had been destroyed! put the building to use immedistely the suuatters had been encted The cah noticcable change was that the lavatories But us main aim a much widet. says squatters" lender Piets Corbya: This reoccupation is intended to spearhead a fight against the present carve-up of Camden High Street. Levy's are out to make millions from the site by destroying homes and shops and erecting new office

← Chile blacking puts Labour on spotLABOUR'S IRISH PLAN IN RUINS Coventry workers say - DEFEND ALL WAGES AGAINST INFLATION →

Something wrong on this page?